<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bryce Foster | Duane Lerche | Activity</title>
	<link>https://brycefoster.com/members/cattle81glider/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://brycefoster.com/members/cattle81glider/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Duane Lerche.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 02:46:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0533f4c4e486e926bf7c9f1cb0f714d8</guid>
				<title>Duane Lerche posted an update: handle, but effect not substantial when examining subgroups [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/846509/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 01:50:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>handle, but effect not substantial when examining subgroups matched for skin potential. SZ had drastically a lot more visual than auditory CRs; opposite connection in HNs. CRs for visual EBC greater in SZ vs. HN (but no statistical test reported). CR ?SZ had considerably higher  CRs than controls and reached 70  <a>1568539X-00003152</a> CR studying&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-846509"><a href="https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/846509/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d8cd563dc3daf4a8d0cd4241b4fa4002</guid>
				<title>Duane Lerche posted an update: F the cerebellum inside the circuit underlying delay EBC. [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/845796/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:50:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F the cerebellum inside the circuit underlying delay EBC. Moreover, as discussed in <a>1479-5868-9-35</a> the following paragraphs, there are no extraneous variables (i.e., medication status, sample size, diverse analytical approaches, parametric variability, non-associative blinking function, and investigative group) that could totally account for these&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-845796"><a href="https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/845796/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">634c5af7bb9ab229b66374f3fdf9088a</guid>
				<title>Duane Lerche posted an update: F the cerebellum in the circuit underlying delay EBC. [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/844505/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:19:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F the cerebellum in the circuit underlying delay EBC. Furthermore, as discussed in <a>1479-5868-9-35</a> the following paragraphs, you will find no extraneous variables (i.e., medication status, sample size, diverse analytical approaches, parametric variability, non-associative blinking function, and investigative group) that could completely account for&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-844505"><a href="https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/844505/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2494edc0aecfdb7f65e90c56eaaefdc9</guid>
				<title>Duane Lerche posted an update: F the cerebellum in the circuit underlying delay EBC. In [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/844495/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:06:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F the cerebellum in the circuit underlying delay EBC. In addition, as discussed in <a>1479-5868-9-35</a> the following paragraphs, there are no extraneous variables (i.e., medication status, sample size, different analytical approaches, parametric variability, non-associative blinking function, and investigative group) that could fully account for these&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-844495"><a href="https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/844495/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">29501214949b53fc90322437831da74d</guid>
				<title>Duane Lerche posted an update: G rate of conditioning, Stevens and colleagues (59) measured [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/841828/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 15:34:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G rate of conditioning, Stevens and colleagues (59) measured the quantity <a>1479-5868-9-35</a> of trials it took for participants to reach &#8220;criterion,&#8221; or 5 consecutive CRs. This style of evaluation will not be reported in most other research. Another study appeared to restrict their evaluation such that fairly significantly less data are incorporated&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-841828"><a href="https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/841828/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2fb6a92251189aaa5d126e8ef1f848f7</guid>
				<title>Duane Lerche posted an update: G price of conditioning, Stevens and colleagues (59) measured [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/841388/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:36:22 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G price of conditioning, Stevens and colleagues (59) measured the quantity <a>1479-5868-9-35</a> of trials it took for participants to attain &#8220;criterion,&#8221; or five consecutive CRs. This style of evaluation is just not reported in most other research. Another study appeared to restrict their evaluation such that reasonably much less data are incorporated&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-841388"><a href="https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/841388/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">36959826ba2320edb2476c73f475867f</guid>
				<title>Duane Lerche posted an update: F the cerebellum in the circuit underlying delay EBC. [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/838171/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 02:32:22 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F the cerebellum in the circuit underlying delay EBC. Furthermore, as discussed in <a>1479-5868-9-35</a> the following paragraphs, there are no extraneous variables (i.e., medication status, sample size, unique analytical approaches, <a href="https://www.medchemexpress.com/CY5-SE.html" rel="nofollow ugc">CY5-SE</a> parametric variability, non-associative blinking function, and investigative group) that could fully account for&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-838171"><a href="https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/838171/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">df9cb29b0754763fec2afb94e349780b</guid>
				<title>Duane Lerche posted an update: F the cerebellum within the circuit underlying delay EBC. [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/838138/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 02:18:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F the cerebellum within the circuit underlying delay EBC. Moreover, as discussed in <a>1479-5868-9-35</a> the following paragraphs, you&#8217;ll find no extraneous variables (i.e., medication status, sample size, diverse analytical approaches, parametric variability, non-associative blinking function, and investigative group) that could totally account for&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-838138"><a href="https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/838138/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">79d373eeb80ea2ae88a27d68d7b18033</guid>
				<title>Duane Lerche posted an update: A-analytic approach; hence, as a lot more studies are [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/833807/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2017 03:35:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A-analytic approach; hence, as a lot more studies are performed making use of consistent techniques, statistical analyses, and reporting, this approach ought to be viewed as. Third, further replication of the primary findings of this evaluation write-up (i.e., an EBC deficit in schizophrenia) is essential provided that 1 investigative group has&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-833807"><a href="https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/833807/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f0a363fd013ddf7c1a3c8ad6ac2731ab</guid>
				<title>Duane Lerche posted an update: F the cerebellum in the circuit underlying delay EBC. [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/832467/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 16:09:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F the cerebellum in the circuit underlying delay EBC. Furthermore, as discussed in <a>1479-5868-9-35</a> the following paragraphs, you can find no extraneous variables (i.e., medication status, sample size, various analytical approaches, parametric variability, non-associative blinking function, and investigative group) that could fully account for these&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-832467"><a href="https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/832467/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e1a370e359ef5ff737e5942997a3e041</guid>
				<title>Duane Lerche posted an update: control, but effect not substantial when examining subgroups [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/829248/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 20:06:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>control, but effect not substantial when examining subgroups matched for skin prospective. SZ had drastically more visual than auditory CRs; opposite partnership in HNs. CRs for visual EBC greater in SZ vs. HN (but no statistical test reported). CR ?SZ had drastically higher  CRs than controls and reached 70  <a>1568539X-00003152</a> CR finding out&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-829248"><a href="https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/829248/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d4626bcd2924cc55fc0e00ae8c2fd1d0</guid>
				<title>Duane Lerche posted an update: Mographic Variables Various research have failed to discover [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/810112/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 03:49:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mographic Variables Various research have failed to discover <a>1479-5868-9-35</a> important relationships amongst <a href="http://hsepeoplejobs.com/members/jason7pastry/activity/423981/" rel="nofollow ugc">N value (respondents)] Answer option [n ( )] Not typically (score 1?) Normally (score</a> schizophrenia symptom severity and EBC dependent variables (61, 63, 68). Brown and colleagues (61) and Bolbecker and colleagues (63) also reported null&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-810112"><a href="https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/810112/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a30d12807d7122fcc9dd32f49f3cc45c</guid>
				<title>Duane Lerche posted an update: CRs in controls vs. SZ in block 9 of conditioning. UR ?No [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/809926/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 02:41:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CRs in controls vs. SZ in block 9 of conditioning. UR ?No significant differences in UR <a>1479-5868-9-35</a> peak amplitude for paired or unpaired trials. No considerable correlation between unpaired UR peak amplitude and mean CR amplitude. Bolbecker et al. (63) CR ?Significantly decreased  CRs and shorter CR peak latency in SZ vs. controls. UR&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-809926"><a href="https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/809926/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c421370534081426b38d499ecb6e5029</guid>
				<title>Duane Lerche became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://brycefoster.com/activity/p/762968/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 01:52:51 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>