No doubt continue to flourish.Aristotle (1999/330 BC). Nicomachean Ethics, trans. T. Irwin. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. Barrett, L. F. (2006a). Solving the emotion paradox: categorization as well as the experience of emotion. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10, 20?six. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_2 Barrett, L. F. (2006b). Valence is actually a simple developing block of emotional life. J. Res. Pers. 40, 35?5. doi: ten.1037/a0024081 Barrett, L. F., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K. N., and Gross, J. J. (2007). The practical experience of emotion. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 373?03. doi: ten.1146/annurev. psych.58.110405.085709 Bartels, D. M. (2008). Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and selection producing. Cognition 108, 381?17. doi: ten.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.001 Bartels, D. M., and Pizarro, D. A. (2011). The mismeasure of morals: antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition 121, 154?61. doi: ten.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.Beyond BiasClaims of people’s deviation from normative or rational models of behavior abound SAR405 web Within the psychological literature. As Krueger and Funder (2004) have shown, bias is normally implied each by pattern X and by pattern not X, leaving it close to not possible to uncover unbiased behavior. As one particular example, viewing oneself more favorably than others constitutes a bias (self-enhancement), as does viewing oneself significantly less favorably (self-effacement). The emphasis on bias, and its supposed ubiquity, similarly exists in the moral judgment literature. Haidt (2001, p. 822) notes that “moral reasoning is not left no cost to search for truth but is most likely to be hired out like a lawyer by many motives,”Within a recent article, Gomez-Marin et al. (2014) defined animal behavior as “the macroscopic expression of neural activity, implemented by muscular and glandular contractions acting on the physique, and resulting in egocentric and allocentric alterations in an organized temporal sequence” (p. 1456). This definition highlights the complexity of behavior when it comes to “systemic emergence” from micro to macro components (Serra and Zanarini, 2012; Liu et al., 2013; Reynolds, 2014). Modeling behavior is attainable in the micro level through computational neuroscience and at the macro level (society) by way of computational psychology (e.g., social network evaluation and mathematical modeling). Nevertheless, the real dilemma for researcher is to realize to what extent realistic behavior might be modeled, as behavior is relational, dynamic, and multidimensional (Gomez-Marin et al., 2014). These 3 attributes are necessary so as to understand the complexity of modeling behavior. Human behavior is relational within the sense that humans, interacting, act inside a context, inside a planet. These interactions are certainly not static but rather exist and continuously adjust in time and space. Furthermore, behavior is manifested in several types, for instance gestures, expressions, and psychophysiological modifications. Due to the complex nature of behavior (Bieri, 1955; Cambel, 1993; Robertson and Combs, 2014), its modeling cannot be based on a combination of variables in equations (Cushing, 2013; Puccia and Levins, 2013). Instead, the relational, dynamic, and multidimensional nature of behavior will have to beFrontiers in Psychology | http://www.frontiersin.orgNovember 2015 | Volume 6 | ArticleCipressoModeling behavior dynamicsstudied below the umbrella of complicated systems, applying computational science (Thelen and Smith, 1996, 2007; Vespignani, 2012; Goertzel, 2013; Liu et al., 2013).