Idual behavior as the outcome of context-specific cues and makes use of long-term memory storage inside a dynamic way–that is, emphasizing both what the individual brings for the table from individual knowledge as well as the situational cues that trigger such practical experience. We present the social-cognitive model of transference plus the relational self, and also the analysis that supports it (e.g., Chen and Andersen, 1999; Andersen and Chen, 2002), as an IF HENFrontiers in Psychology | http://www.frontiersin.orgJanuary 2016 | Volume 6 | ArticleAndersen et al.Contextual Variability in Personalityperson-situation interaction model and an interpersonal version of what exactly is generally known as the cognitive-affective personality method or cognitive-affective processing program (CAPS) approach. Beyond this, we go additional here than elsewhere in specifying the relation of our framework towards the CAPS model, and further, address explicitly the voluminous literature on trait dispositions (particularly interpersonal traits) and their potential interface with this framework. The CAPS framework relies on cognitive-affective units (CAUs), which represent person experience and contribute to an individual’s interpretations and behavior in particular contexts (Mischel and Shoda, 1995; see also Metcalfe and Mischel, 1999). Past experience alters the which means and significance accorded to present conditions, and importantly, the strength and likelihood of relevant behaviors getting enacted in these conditions. Of central significance in predicting human behavior, and if preferred, in altering it, is accounting for the stimuli in circumstances that prompt certain behavioral patterns (Metcalfe and Mischel, 1999). The cognitive-affective systems model of character is as a result an IF HEN theory in which the situation–or set of triggering cues–interacts with what ever disposition or set of associations the person has with these cues, which in turn, areas the individual inside a distinct psychological scenario. Indeed, the situational IF cue(s) evokes a contextual THEN, or the relevant knowledge and behavior. In our investigation, we have examined how mental representations of important others–that is, any vital person, such as a close pal, existing or past romantic partner, sibling, or parent whom the person knows well and has had a considerable influence around the individual–arise as a function of contextual cues, and influence moment-to-moment interpersonal responses on the basis of their implicit activation. For the reason that significant-other representations are usually evoked and applied, they have a tendency to be chronically accessible (Andersen et al., 1995) and are a lot more probably to become evoked if triggering cues are present in the predicament (Andersen et al., 1995; Chen et al., 1999; see Higgins, 1989, 1990). Hence, inside the process referred to as transference, certain cues inside a new particular person, such as his or her behavior or conveyed beliefs, attributes, or even facial functions, can activate a relevant significantother representation. The representation is then N emphasized transference inside the therapeutic context. However applied to understanding the new particular person. Not surprisingly, substantial other people are, by definition, people today in whom the individual is invested emotionally and motivationally (Higgins, 1987, 1997; Hinkley and Andersen, 1996; Andersen et al., 1998). Hence, they enable for unique relevance to be accorded to a brand new particular person, when triggered in transference, major the new person to become observed, interpreted, and remembered in terms of significant-other understanding, though also evoking several different re.